Integration assurance, in your own codebase.
Your engineers are maintaining integrations instead of building the thing only they can build.
Hazel's Agents does the first so they can do the second. New integrations are built directly in your repository, in the same CI/CD architecture you already run, and the ones you have, kept updated. Your engineers review and merge every change.
Built by the team behind OneHazel. Live in iGaming production since 2026.
Why the work never gets done
Keeping the integrations you already have working is not optional, so it always gets done. Everything behind it waits. New integrations sit in the backlog, and so does the product work that would actually set you apart, because both are competing with something that cannot be deferred.
What the agents do
New integrations. Built directly in your repository, using the patterns your engineers already use, in the same CI/CD architecture you already run. Nothing new is added to your stack, and no system of ours runs inside your business.
The ones you already have. Re-checked continuously against the APIs you depend on. When something upstream changes, you get the fix already written, as a code change your team approves or rejects.
Agents propose. Your team merges. Every change arrives as a code change in your own review process, with the evidence needed to judge it. Nothing is written to your production, ever, and that is a property of the architecture rather than a policy we operate.
Drift
Drift is what we call it when something you depend on changes relative to what you hold. An endpoint gains a required field. A response shape moves. An authentication flow is deprecated on a timetable nobody on your team was tracking.
Drift is caught when the change is published, not when it reaches you, and the fix arrives with it, already written. That order matters: a fix cannot be written in advance unless the change was seen in advance.
Where drift actually lives
Your team may already have AI that can read your codebase. It has never seen your production configuration, and that is where most drift turns out to live: in settings inside running systems rather than in committed code.
We are specific about the boundary because you should be able to check it. The agents work on what lives in your repository. What lives in a running system's configuration is a different surface, and we would rather tell you that up front than have you discover it in month three.
You lease the agents. You own everything they write.
The integrations are yours: your repository, your commit history, your code, written to your standards and merged by your engineers. There is nothing to extract and nothing that stops working because a relationship ends.
That is the difference between leasing capability and renting access to somebody else's system. It is also why the agents work inside your codebase rather than between you and the APIs you depend on.
Is this you?
If you own the integration code and have a team who can merge, that is Hazel's Agents. If you would rather the integration was not your problem at all, that is the OneHazel platform, and it is a different shape of product for a different shape of business.
The distinction is architectural, not a polite way of discussing budget. The agents need a codebase to work in and engineers to review what they propose. Without both, there is nothing for them to do.
Where we are
Hazel's Agents is sold as Agents as a Service. It is built by the team behind OneHazel, which has been live in iGaming production since 2026, and it is operated by ZS Digital Ltd in Malta.
Winner, Next.io Valletta Startup Pitch 2026. Winner, SiGMA Asia Startup Pitch 2026.
Talk to us
The useful version of this conversation is a specific one: which APIs you depend on, what is sitting in the backlog, and what your review process looks like. Thirty minutes with Keith, who runs these directly.